From c2d0cdfb0b960ea5911cabf7dc1ad16e5b4e67fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sir Richard Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 22:45:17 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] [NTOS]: Fix a typo spotted by Stefan. svn path=/trunk/; revision=56296 --- reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/pagfault.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/pagfault.c b/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/pagfault.c index f7e70037de5..970d2d2be40 100644 --- a/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/pagfault.c +++ b/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/pagfault.c @@ -1130,7 +1130,7 @@ UserFault: MiCheckPdeForPagedPool(Address); #endif /* Has the code above changed anything -- is this now a valid PTE? */ - Status = (PointerPte->u.Hard.Valid == 1) ? STATUS_SUCCESS : STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION; + Status = (PointerPde->u.Hard.Valid == 1) ? STATUS_SUCCESS : STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION; /* Either this was a bogus VA or we've fixed up a paged pool PDE */ MiUnlockProcessWorkingSet(CurrentProcess, CurrentThread);